Manafonistas

on life, music etc beyond mainstream

Now this will always stick in memory. Once upon a time, in March 1982, the month of its release, ON LAND found its way to my little house in deep Bavaria, on a hillside, a quite desolate no-man’s land for a townie, but fitting well to the haunting atmospheres of the album. It has been a companion of awe and wonder ever since then, and I really installed this ambient speaker system in my living room. Though it was definitely a tiny, ugly and cheap third speaker, I loved that experience. Now we live in different times, and surround systems are no longer that expensive. Thus a quad or 5:1-mix would be easy going, and, for a record like ON LAND, a perfect option. But here we go, with the half-speed vinyl remaster that in fact sounds beautiful, opening up even more depths. At least that’s what I’m feeling, I’m surely not painstakingly comparing it with old pressings. And everybody who has the 2005 cd remaster can happily live forever with that one. Brian had worked on the album quite a while during his New York years, and I was living literally at the end of a world, in Bergeinöden (the name of the village, no pun intended), with great music (Jazz by Post had been my favourite dealer), hot love, drama, Neil Young in concert, weekend travels to Schwabing, my first Go-Betweens record, Cortazar books, my salad days of volleyball,  and no happy endings. But it was worth the trip, at least that‘s what I keep telling myself. Scary Monsters were all around, but somehow I  managed to remain in light. (m.e.)

 

 

 

 

I regard this music as environmental: to be experienced from the inside. Accordingly I considered releasing a quadrophonic version of it, an idea I abandoned upon realising that very few people (myself included) own quadrophonic systems.

However, I have for many years been using a three-way speaker system that is both simple to install and inexpensive, and which seems to work very well on any music with a broad stereo image. The effect is subtle but definite – it opens out the music and seems to enlarge the room acoustically.

In addition to a normal stereo hifi system all that is required is one extra loudspeaker and some speaker cable. The usage of this speaker in the three-way system is such that it will not be required to handle very low frequencies: therefore a small or „mini“ speaker will be adequate.

As shown in the diagram, the two terminals of the new speaker are connected to the two positive (red) speaker connectors on the amplifier. This speaker is located somewhere behind the listener – at the apex of a triangle whose base is formed by the original loudspeaker set-up. One of the unexpected benefits of this system is an increase in the usable listening area – almost any point in the room will yield good (although not necessarily „accurate“) stereo sound.

I arrived at this system by accident, and I don’t really know why it works. What seems to happen is that the third speaker reproduces any sound that is not common to both sides of the stereo – i.e., everything that is not located centrally in the stereo image – and I assume that this is because the common information is put out of phase with itself and cancels out.

More technically, the lower the impedance of the added speaker, the louder it will sound. If it is found to be too loud (although this rarely seems to happen), you can either insert a potentiometer (6-12 ohms, at least 10 watts) into the circuit, or move the speaker further away.

Dieser Beitrag wurde geschrieben am Samstag, 17. November 2018 und wurde abgelegt unter "Blog". Du kannst die Kommentare verfolgen mit RSS 2.0. Kommentare und Pings sind zur Zeit geschlossen.

3 Kommentare

  1. Michael Engelbrecht:

    There was another background text for ON LAND, written by Brian Eno, and a very interesting one. Here it is, in case anyone doesn‘t know about it ….

    The idea of making music that in some way related to a sense of place – landscape, environment – had occurred to me many times over the years preceding „On Land“. Each time, however, I relegated it to a mental shelf because it hadn’t risen above being just another idea – a diagram rather than a living and breathing music. In retrospect, I now see the influence of this idea, and the many covert attempts to realise it, running through most of the work that I’ve released like an unacknowledged but central theme. This often happens; you imagine a territory rich in possibilities and try to think of how you might get to it, and then suddenly one day you look around and realise that you have been there for quite a long time.

    My conscious exploration of this way of thinking about music probably began with „Another Green World“ (1975). On that record I became aware of setting each place within its own particular landscape and allowing the mood of that landscape to determine the kinds of activity that could occur. Working from the realisation that my music was less and less connected with performability but was created in and of the studio, I took advantage of the fact that music produced in recording studios (rather than music reproduced by studios) has the option of creating its own psychoacoustic space. Most frequently this has been achieved by mechanical or electronic echoes and delays: short repeat echoes connoting rectilinear urban spaces, for example, and until recently, these possibilities have been used „realistically“ to evoke spaces that were recognizable. From „Another Green World“ onwards I became interested in exaggerating and inventing rather than replicating spaces, experimenting in particular with various techniques of time distortion. This record represents one culmination of that development and in it the landscape has ceased to be a backdrop for something else to happen in front of; instead, everything that happens is a part of the landscape. There is no longer a sharp distinction between foreground and background.

    In using the term landscape I am thinking of places, times, climates and the moods that they evoke. And of expanded moments of memory too… One of the inspirations for this record was Fellini’s „Amarcord“ („I Remember“), a presumably unfaithful reconstruction of childhood moments. Watching that film, I imagined an aural counterpart to it, and that became one of the threads woven into the fabric of the music.

    What qualified a piece for inclusion on the record was that it took me somewhere, but this might be somewhere that I’d never been before, or somewhere I’d only imagined going to. Lantern Marsh, for example, is a place only a few miles from where I grew up in East Anglia, but my experience of it derives not from having visited it (although I almost certainly did) but from having subsequently seen it on a map and imagining where and what it might be. We feel affinities not only with the past, but also with the futures that didn’t materialize, and with the other variations of the present that we suspect run parallel to the one we have agreed to live in.

    The choice of sonic elements in these places arose less from listening to music than from listening to the world in a musical way. When I was in Ghana, for instance, I took with me a stereo microphone and a cassette recorder, ostensibly to record indigenous music and speech patterns. What I sometimes found myself doing instead was sitting out on the patio in the evenings with the microphone placed to pick up the widest possible catchment of ambient sounds from all directions, and listening to the result on my headphones. The effect of this simple technological system was to cluster all the disparate sounds into one aural frame; they became music.

    Listening this way, I realised I had been moving towards a music that had this feeling; as the listener, I wanted to be situated inside a large field of loosely-knit sound, rather than placed before a tightly organised monolith (or stereolith, for that matter). I wanted to open out the aural field, to put much of the sound a considerable distance from the listener (even locating some of it „out of earshot“), and to allow the sounds to live their lives separately from one another, clustering occasionally but not „musically“ bound together. This gave rise to an interesting technical difficulty. Because recording studio technology and practice developed in relation to performed music, the trend of that development has been towards greater proximity, tighter and more coherent meshing of sounds with one another. Shortly after I returned from Ghana, Robert Quine gave me a copy of Miles Davis‘ „He Loved Him Madly“. Teo Macero’s revolutionary production on that piece seemed to me to have the „spacious“ quality I was after, and like „Amarcord“, it too became a touchstone to which I returned frequently.

    As I made these pieces, I began to take a different attitude towards both the materials and the procedures I was using. I found the synthesizer, for example, of limited usefulness because its sound tended towards a diagrammatic rather than an organic quality. My instrumentation shifted gradually through electro-mechanical and acoustic instruments towards non-instruments like pieces of chain and sticks and stones. Coupled with this transition was an increasing interest in found sound as a completely plastic and malleable material; I never felt any sense of obligation about realism. In this category I included not only recordings of rooks, frogs and insects, but also the complete body of my own earlier work. As a result, some earlier pieces I worked on became digested by later ones, which in turn became digested again. The technique is like composting: converting what would otherwise have been waste into nourishment.

    Brian Eno

    1982, revised February 1986

  2. Brian Whistler:

    This has always been my favorite of the ambient music series. I would love to hear a 5.1 mix of this. Just as Revolution #9 has opened up into a whole new sonic reality, revealing just how good it actually was,, I think this album would benefit from the surround experience. Probably most of, if not all of Enos work would.

    I’m surprised there aren’t more ambient music creators who aren’t embracing the 5.1 or quad formats. With so many people having 5.1 entertainment systems, it would appear bows the time for music to go mainstream with surround mixes.I know there are a few prog bands that are doing so, but really, I would think ambient music creators would be jumping all over this by now.

    It’s also amazing to me that of all the natural environment recordings, there are only 4 in 5.1 that I know of, all done by Dan Gibson, who made literally dozens of schmaltzy music and environment recordings during his career, but also a few gems of well recorded nature sounds, His SACD series includes one of my favorite birdsong recordings, Songbirds. At the right volume you are in the middle of a forest of songbirds, in some ways better than today’s “silent spring” reality – where I live Here in he middle of the forest, nowadays, all we hear are crows, blue jays and Woodpeckers. The songbirds have long since flown the coop, so to speak.

  3. Michael Engelbrecht:

    I‘m always happy to hear from you, signs of life from your pre-apocalyptic California. And a studio near the Russian River, well, I hope we will meet there one day. Talking into the night…, with a pile of buried treasures, in terms of records …

    One of the records I had been listening to in Bergeinöden, in 1982, had been the Allman Brothers‘ „Live At Fillmore East“, and knowing – now – you had been part of the audience, always puts a smile on my face nowadays. Meanwhile I do own the 5:1 mixes of all the three nights they had been playing there: so your handclapping is on the tape, definitely. My all time favourite blues rock album…


Manafonistas | Impressum | Kontakt | Datenschutz